I believe reading criticisms of my work is essential to
becoming a stronger writer. Every book I’ve
signed has included my author email and a request to give me some
feedback. I read every review and criticism
and try to weigh that against my work in an effort to find weaknesses in my
writing style. But art is a funny
thing.
It’s not concrete.
One person may hate certain types of stories or prefer certain settings
or genres. Some people won’t ever pick
up my work simply because it’s science fiction.
On the other hand, I’m not one to read vampire or romance novels. So, much of what we “like” or “don’t like” is
about taste. That begs the question:
when does dismissing a criticism because of personal taste become a cop-out and
when should I take the time to address the issues someone has?
I haven’t gotten many reviews (for those reading this and
have read my stuff I would be grateful for an honest Goodreads or Amazon
review), but I have thoroughly read the reviews of those who have taken their
valuable time comment on my work. I have
tried to soak up all I can and want to use your insight to see weaknesses in my
work.
I have, (to date) only received one scathing review. That was delivered privately and not in one
of the public forums. The woman’s
opinions were so harsh that it seemed she found my stories not just bad, but
offensive. I was mystified by some of
the things that she said and really wanted to refute others, but I reminded
myself that it was her honest opinion and my stories just weren’t for her.
One thing she did say that gave me pause (and seemed like a
legitimate criticism) was that she felt I told the story through too many eyes,
leaving her unsure which characters were the “main” characters. I really gave some thought to that. Was I using too many characters? Should I limit the number of POVs to one or two
central characters or should I stay with what I was doing?
Well, I think I have an answer: yes and no. Clear as mud,
right? Well, this is art, and the “rules” of art tend to be fuzzy. There are certain concepts I believe in: kill
as many adverbs as possible, don’t change POV in the middle of a scene, avoid
the passive voice…the list goes on. But,
the stylistic choice to tell the story through the eyes of many characters is
different.
I am aware that I write stories that sometimes require the
reader to keep up. I have complex plot
threads (some of them occur completely off the page) that require the reader to
pay attention. There’s a lot going
on. Threads that start out far apart in
the beginning of the story come together in (what I hope is) a well-woven
tapestry that holds up under scrutiny and (more importantly) is entertaining.
I have always enjoyed complex stories like these, stories
that deal with the conflicting motivations of their characters, stories that
can make even the villains believable and relatable, stories that bring people
who were far apart at the beginning of the tale together for its climax. This often requires the eyes of several
characters.
Furthermore, I feel that telling the story through the eyes
of certain characters can help build suspense. If I introduce you to a
character and invest time getting to know him/her and then that person is
killed in the first or second act, is any character safe? Or, if I have a
ticking time bomb in the plot of which the main characters are ignorant, how
can I make the reader aware without letting my main characters in on it? The
answer becomes simple: show it through the eyes of the villain or other lesser
character. That’s sometimes the only way
to preserve the suspense while keeping the main characters oblivious to the
danger lurking in the shadows.
Harry Turttledove, George R. R. Martin, and Stephen King
have all told complex stories through the eyes of many characters very often. The Game of Thrones series and Needful Things novel are just two
examples of how these techniques have been used to great success. But, that doesn’t
mean that I should just do this with reckless abandon.
I included some “background scenes” as told through the eyes
of Turab Al Saad, Aaron Bell, and Kimball Rhodes in Procythian Reign, but I really like them. Two of the three sire characters who play at
least a supporting role in the next Proceena installment and the other provides
an up-close-and-personal view of the Wolf lycosaries, characters I’m trying to
get great use out of in the last Proceena installment. Also, the Battle of Bravura City has
tremendous repercussions throughout the rest of the Proceena stories, so it
felt appropriate to include those moments of history in the story.
There is something to be said for keeping the story as
focused on as few characters as possible.
Using too many point of views can take focus away from the story’s
central events. I struggled with keeping
the reader up on important events happening off the page while staying with the
main conflict between the Clabar-Bankovs and the Al Saads in The Proceena Crusade. I rewrote and
restructured many times, not to change the essential story, but to funnel the
story through the eyes of as few characters as possible. I’m delighted with the results. I hope you are, too.
Now, I find myself writing my last Proceena story and I have
been attempting to minimize the characters through which I tell the story, and
this story is blossoming into a story of which I know I’m going to be proud and
(I hope) you’re going to enjoy. But, I think
I’ll be adding some more substance to this plot and adding a few characters with
whom to tell the stories, but the last Proceena story has to be big. It is,
after all, a space opera.
I’m going to work hard to keep the story flowing through the
central characters, but I don’t want to short change you with a half-told
stories. I just know it’s going to be a
lot of fun!